Bobby Petrino has a knack for making his exits noteworthy. He signed a 10-year contract with Louisville and left for the Atlanta Falcons five months later. After a terrible start to his time with the Falcons, he decided he'd had enough, posted laminated farewells to all the players in the locker room, and left for Arkansas. He had a good tenure with the Razorbacks but lied to his bosses about an affair with a staffer, which only came out because he crashed his motorcycle. The lasting image of not just the scandal, but Petrino's Arkansas tenure, is the neck brace he wore to a press conference after the crash.
Petrino's lone year at Western Kentucky was far more mundane, unfortunately. He got in, he won eight games to show he still had it, and he got out. And for a while, it seemed like his second crack at the Louisville job was going to be just fine: He won 34 games in four years. As part of an exceptional 2016 season for the Cardinals, Lamar Jackson won the Heisman. It was all going smoothly.
And then Petrino just gave up. In 2018, Louisville lost eight games by 21 points or more, finishing winless against ACC opponents. Petrino didn't see the end of the season, as the school decided after allowing 77 points to Clemson that it was worth paying Petrino's ludicrous $14 million buyout. The news broke of his firing while his pre-taped weekly television show was on.
Missouri State is Petrino's current home. Unfortunately, since it's an FCS program that was so willing to the Bobby Petrino experience that they hired him, I don't expect we'll see another high-profile, extravagant flameout.
But I want to focus on that last season with Louisville. It's hard to find a more immediate or steep collapse in the last decade than Petrino's 2018. Unsurprisingly, the school took a major step back in recruiting. After averaging roughly the 34th-best class in the country over the previous four years, Louisville fell to 70th in the 2019 recruiting rankings.
In the first part of this study, we finished by establishing a positive relationship between a team's single-season winning percentage and how good their recruiting class is both that year and the following year. It wasn't very strong, but it appeared to be there.
What I want to do this time is look specifically at the extreme ends of the spectra of winning and recruiting, though — still excluding Group of Five and Blue Chip Ratio schools, and still sticking to the Playoff era, but trying to find the seasons and classes that really stick out within our population.